Download Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, the Devil, Sin, and Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion
The first thing to visit the collection is considering just what publication to read. When you are here and also visiting this internet library, we will certainly recommend you numerous advised publications for you. The books that is truly proper with your life and duties. Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, The Devil, Sin, And Other Worries Of The So-Called Philosophy Of Religion is among the optional book brochures that can be most desired.
Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, the Devil, Sin, and Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion
Download Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, the Devil, Sin, and Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion
Discover your personal ways to meet your free time. Taking into consideration reviewing a book as one of the activities to do in leisure may be proper. Reading a book is valuable as well as it will interest in the new points. Reviewing, as taken into consideration as the boring activity, could not rally be as just what you think of. Yeah, reading can be enjoyable, reading can be pleasurable, and also reading will offer you new points, even more points.
This location is an internet book that you could discover and also take pleasure in several type of publication catalogues. There will certainly come several differences of exactly how you find Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, The Devil, Sin, And Other Worries Of The So-Called Philosophy Of Religion in this web site as well as off collection or the book stores. But, the major factor is that you might not go for lengthy minute to seek for the book. Yeah, you should be smarter in this modern period. By advanced technology, the online collection and also store is offered.
Somebody will certainly always have factor when providing in some cases. As here, we likewise have several practical benefits to extract from this book. First, you can be among the hundreds people who read this Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, The Devil, Sin, And Other Worries Of The So-Called Philosophy Of Religion, from several places. Then, you could get a very simple method to discover, get, as well as read this publication; it's presented in soft file based on internet system. So, you could read it in your gizmo where it will certainly be constantly be with you.
When you need additionally the various other publication category or title, locate the book in this internet site. One to remember, we do not only offer Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, The Devil, Sin, And Other Worries Of The So-Called Philosophy Of Religion for you, we likewise have many great deals of guides from lots of libraries the entire globe. Think of, exactly how can you get guide from various other nation quickly? Just be here. Simply from this web site you could discover this condition. So, simply join with us now.
Product details
Paperback: 238 pages
Publisher: St Augustine Pr Inc; Revised edition (June 1, 2001)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1890318876
ISBN-13: 978-1890318871
Product Dimensions:
6 x 0.5 x 8.8 inches
Shipping Weight: 13.4 ounces
Average Customer Review:
3.7 out of 5 stars
5 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#376,355 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Kolakowski is a believer - at least for the purposes of this book. The narrator here explicitly believes in a Christian personal God. What is more, he sees such belief as an integral part of an overall commitment to a lived religious practice, in his case, it would seem, Catholicism. This is the vantage from which he surveys the territory of the "So-Called Philosophy of Religion".These are his allegiances, but his discussion ranges beyond his specific position. Rather than a straight defense, he surveys other positions and critiques their inconsistencies and attractions. But a reader must be careful. At times he asserts his own favoured conclusions without signalling that alternate conclusions could (and have) been drawn elsewhere. His erudition is remarkable in its breadth and depth, and as an intellectual guide he is charismatic.The main motivation for his religiosity appears to be confronting such questions as, "What is the purpose of my life?" and, more grandly, "What is the meaning of life, the universe, and everything?" (my apologies to Douglas Adams). He takes these questions to be real questions. No argument extracted from the philosophy of language, or from other intellectual territory, is going to sway him. He feels these questions are ones humans inevitably encounter and which are, on their own terms, comprehensible. For Kolakowski, the only satisfying answers to such questions come from the realms of religion. He, like Arthur Dent before him, finds "42" a trifle disappointing as "The Answer".However, the answers given by religion will be in religious language. Kolakowski comes close to saying that such language will not be comprehensible to a non-believer. It will not stand rational scrutiny. It is language grappling with concepts and questions which are beyond any language - as per the title of his chapter, "To Speak the Unspeakable". This intrinsically unresolvable situation is one which he feels is unavoidable - it is part of the human condition.A second strong motivation for religiosity emerges in the first main chapter, "Theodicy: God of Failures": an explanation for, or at least solace from, human misery. Religion does not explain, in any scientific sense, misery, but it offers a somewhat comforting perspective from which to accept misery's presence. A faith that ultimately the cosmos is a meaningful experience, that from God's vantage suffering has its place and purpose, is said to be of solace to humans. One of the core ideas in this chapter is that if momentary suffering is inscribed in eternity, then it is more meaningful than if it were "lost" with the passing of the moment; that is, if the measure of reality is taken to be "eternal reality" and the transient "now" is seen as somehow "less real", then momentary suffering has a chance of being seen as "meaning" something more than its own misery.Kolakowski allows that an extreme rationalist could consistently deny that such questions as to ultimate meaning and the justification of suffering are answerable. The transcendent vantage can be considered a useful, or pernicious, fiction. Truth becomes an operational concept, one aiming to better manipulate the world to immediate ends. All talk of a transcendent reality remains just talk. But Kolakowski does not think that being a extreme rationalist is an easy stance to adopt, neither intellectually nor emotionally. Nor does he see the rationalist as having an argument against religious belief which the believer must acknowledge as sound. Once committed to religious practice, the believer has a system of meaning and purpose which is beyond rational criticism.The crucial problem for a believer of Kolakowski's kind is that of the existence of evil. Fairly or not, he summarises twenty five centuries of thought on the subject into two positions.Either one considers the existence of an all-powerful, all benevolent God and the existence of evil as incompatible, and so conclude that such a God does not exist, or one affirms the existence of such a God and then finds a way of reconciling the existence of evil.The first position almost argues for itself. The second, according to Kolakowski, generally relies on an argument dating back to Leibniz and others, and amounts to saying that the actual world is the "best" of all possible worlds, in that any other feasible world would contain more evil. He expounds a few of the tortuous debates that have attempted to make this claim plausible. None are convincing (to Kolakowksi, let alone to skeptics). Ultimately, as a believer, he falls back on a naked belief and trust in God, and an acceptance that rational argument will fail to "prove" or make intelligible the mystery of evil's existence.Kolakowski is not sympathetic to attempts to reconcile religious faith with rational argument. He charts the interaction between the two at length in his chapter, "God of Reasoners". He emphasizes that rationality trespasses on religious ground when speaking of transcendent truth. Any venture into concepts which imply transcendence (such as infinity, being, existence) is to step into religious territory. Rational argument no longer functions as it does when applied to ordinary, everyday, operational matters. The transcendent questions, like "What is the meaning of the universe", are not scientific questions, and the answers they seek will not be of a kind to better predict and manipulate the everyday world. They are, according to Kolakowski, of a different kind, but not therefore meaningless.In the chapter "God of Mystics" Kolakowski openly admits to his admiration of mystical religious experience. He sees it as a core element in the religious world view. By the shape of his discussion he implies that his opinion is by no means universal. Yet he finds powerful the inherently inarticulate claims of mystics to have experienced directly "the Divine". From here he goes on to discuss the problem of maintaining that God is recognizably a person whilst also maintaining that God is timeless, has infinite capacities, etcetera. It is a short step then once again to his acceptance that the language of mysticism, and of faith in general, will not be the language of rational or scientific argument.Ultimately, Kolakowski abides by his own conclusion that a skeptic can't be persuaded by rational argument to become a believer. If the skeptic can forgo the temptation to look for transcendent answers to transcendent questions, then he is immune to the lure of faith. If the temptation proves too great, then Kolakowski's book offers a welcoming hand to those ready to join him in the kingdom of God. For me, I'd rather stay here on Earth, at least until the Vogons arrive, but by then hopefully I'll have made friends with the dolphins...
The book arrived in excellent condition. It is too intense for my needs. It might be good reading for a serious student of religious theory.
Ten thumbs up :)
The book is actually fun to read. He clearly describes the concepts of philosphers, theologians, mystics (and others) on the existence of God. If one doesn't like to think, one will not enjoy the book. If one does enjoy following someone thinking through difficult problems, one will love it.His conclusion is one I came to yeas ago. Everything happening since only increases my conviction. "If God does not exist, then everything is permitted," as Nietsche said. Without objective and shared moral convictions, there can be no civilization--or at least no civility. There must be shared rational standards outside of our own lusts. But, in fact, when an American says "I have a right to it," she only means "I want it." Its like a spoiled 8 year old brat screaming "Johny get a bigger piece of cake than I did."This is why with 5% of the worl'd population, the US has 50% of the world's convicts in jail. When there is no moralaity, there is only "laws" enforced by physical violence.
This is the second book which I have read by this author and if I may say so, out of respect for his age, as well as out of respect for my own faith, it will be the last.This book has an agenda, namely, to persuade the reader, particularly one who is a person of faith, to abandon that faith and follow the author's line of reasoning, which is to deny all but offer nothing in return. He selectively uses excerpts, many out of context, from many past historians, philosophers and theologians none of whom he agrees with yet uses them only to fit or to favor his agenda. Throughout the book he qualifies his statements with many "it seems, perhaps, some would say, others would say" and so on without stating concretely who say what and who doesn't in those specific instances. As a result one is left with a feeling that there is a lot fence straddling going on in this author's mind. Of course, in America, Religion sells and in the current culture, anti-religion probably sells equally well. Curiously, there is hardly any reference to Islam and the bulk of the book is anti-Christian.This book is all about brains without heart and pride without humility. The author on several occasions refers to those who follow certain religious faiths as "simpletons," yet in other parts he stresses the value of equal human dignity for all. Thus, he makes a good argument that some are more equal than others as some are the "elite" brains and the others "simpletons" who deserve only a life of servitude to the intellect of those brains.His concluding remarks, which are supposed to state the author's own and personal viewpoint as to belief in God as well as the meaning of life, are not persuasive and from a psychiatric viewpoint, without affect.It is as if an automaton is speaking.The author mentions St. Augustine several times and if anything this book proves that St. Augustine was correct in that the author's soul is restless and will remain so until it rests in God.
Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, the Devil, Sin, and Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion PDF
Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, the Devil, Sin, and Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion EPub
Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, the Devil, Sin, and Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion Doc
Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, the Devil, Sin, and Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion iBooks
Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, the Devil, Sin, and Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion rtf
Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, the Devil, Sin, and Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion Mobipocket
Religion: If There Is No God-- : On God, the Devil, Sin, and Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar